About Us | Press Room | My ASHRAE | Contact Us | Site Map

Join ASHRAE
Join ASHRAE



AHR Expo 2009





Congressional Briefing Archives

Print This  Email This

Congressional Briefings Archives


Briefing on High-Performance Green Schools: How to Get Them in Your District

October 21, 2008
2:00 pm – 3:30 pm
2168 Rayburn House Office Building

 

Representative Russ Carnahan
Representative Judy Biggert
Deane Evans
Anja Caldwell
Lloyd Horwich
Speakers (l-r): Rep. Russ Carnahan, Rep. Judy Biggert, Deane Evans, Anja Caldwell, Lloyd Horwich

On October 21, the High-Performance Buildings Congressional Caucus Coalition held a briefing to discuss how some school districts are building facilities that save thousands of dollars a year on energy costs, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impact, and are "healthier" and safer than conventional schools. Rep. Russ Carnahan (D-MO) and Rep. Judy Biggert (R-IL), co-chairs of the High-Performance Buildings Congressional Caucus, provided opening remarks, each noting the many benefits of high performance green schools and that this is "truly a bi-partison issue.

Speakers

  • Rep. Russ Carnahan (D-MO), High-Performance Buildings Caucus Co-Chair
  • Rep. Judy Biggert (R-IL), High-Performance Buildings Caucus Co-Chair
  • Deane Evans, FAIA, Executive Director, Center for Architecture and Building Science Research, New Jersey Institute of Technology Presentation (pdf format)
  • Anja Caldwell, LEED AP, Principal of ecoipso LLC Presentation (pdf format)
  • Lloyd Horwich, Education Counsel and Policy Advisor, Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary and Secondary Education, Committee on Education and Labor

Click here for an audio recording of the briefing and Q&A (mp3 format)

Briefing Highlights

  • "High performance" considers a broad array of design objectives: sustainability and all the elements of green design, accessibility, cost effectiveness, safety and security, functionality, productivity, aesthetics, and historic preservation.
  • Schools typically spend five times as much on operating costs than on construction costs for their buildings, which can be attributed to utility bills and maintenance costs.
  • High performance green schools can be built with minimal upfront costs, which are recovered through energy savings over the life cycle of the building.
  • Green schools create more productive learning environments. The implementation of proper daylighting and acoustics has proven to improve student attendance, teacher satisfaction, and academic performance.
  • Green schools also create healthier learning environments. Advanced ventilation systems and air filters reduce airborne allergens and the risk of asthma. Green schools reduce liability exposure by using eco-friendly paints and flooring, as well as enforcing stricter policies for school bus emissions and idling.
  • A key to minimizing upfront costs of implementing these measures is to use a holistic approach and integrate the high performance design goals in the first stages of new construction.
  • It is also essential to use energy analysis tools to optimize the energy performance of existing buildings. When you measure energy usage, you can manage it much more effectively.
  • States and municipalities have begun to fund programs such as the Collaborative for High Performance Schools (CHPS), which provide essential resources for schools to go green.
  • LEED for Schools has become an important rating system guiding the construction of new high performance schools. The Green Globes rating system and CHPS also certifiy green schools.
  • The National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities also provides a wealth of information.
  • Key federal legislation on high performance green schools is included in the Energy Security and Independence Act of 2007 (P.L. 110-140), which, if funded, would provide grants for healthy school environments and outreach.

The High-Performance Buildings Congressional Caucus Coalition (HPBCC) is a private sector coalition providing guidance and support to the High-Performance Buildings Caucus. The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI), Sustainable Buildings Industry Council (SBIC), and the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) were lead sponsors of this briefing and are members of the HPBCCC.

For more information, please contact Ellen Vaughan at evaughan@eesi.org or (202) 662-1893.

Or visit the website: http://www.eesi.org/102108_green_schools


Breakfast Briefing on High-Performance Buildings: Operating After Disasters

Advocacy Events: See Additional PhotosIn the event of a catastrophic event, whether natural or manmade, a high-performance building needs to maintain the safety and security of its occupants while also considering the impact of the event on the mission or function of the facility and on the wider community. Owners, both public and private, must have the ability to require that their building perform to provide the capacity to remain operational after the event.

September 10, 2008 — 9:30 am-11:00 am
U.S. House of Representatives
2325 Rayburn House Office Building

Moderator
Henry Green, Hon. AIA, President, NIBS

Welcome Remarks
Rep. Judy Biggert (R-IL) and Rep. Russ Carnahan (D-MO)
Co-Chairs, High Performance Buildings Congressional Caucus
 

Determining High-Performance Security Needs
Chuck Meyer, P.E.
Chairman, Building Security Council

The Building Security Council of the American Society of Civil Engineers will provide an overview of the new ASCE Building Security Rating Program which building owners, operators and designers can use to determine their building’s high performance security needs. When security is considered in a more holistic manner it will produce better, more innovative solutions which will enhance building security well beyond minimum practices.

 

Providing Federal High-Performance Buildings after a Disaster
Lloyd H. Siegel, FAIA
Office of Construction & Facilities Management
Department of Veterans Affairs

The VA will present their work in developing a methodology for evaluating the operational capacity of their facilities after a major disaster and developing facility design standards for providing operating capabilities after these catastrophic events.


Luncheon Briefing on the Assessment to the U.S. Congress
and U.S. Department of Energy on High Performance Buildings

Rep. Biggert 061808
Representative Judy Biggert speaks at the June 18th Briefing.
• See more photos.  

The U.S. Congress drafted Section 914 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to address not just more energy efficient or “green” buildings but rather high performance buildings that combine the objectives of reducing resource energy consumption while improving the environmental impact, functionality, human comfort and productivity of the building. As a result, Congress turned to the National Institute of Building Science (NIBS), long recognized as an authoritative source of knowledge, to provide a sense of direction for this undertaking. NIBS subsequently formed an ad hoc High-Performance Building Council consisting of representatives of approximately 100 private sector and governmental organizations to advance this mission.

This briefing is intended to introduce the leadership of the new High Performance Building Congressional Caucus, as well as to unveil the final High Performance Building report to Congress and the Department of Energy.

June 18, 2008 • 11:30 am-1:30 pm
U.S. House of Representatives
2325 Rayburn House Office Building 
                                                         

Moderator
Gordon Holness, ASHRAE Society Officer and Treasurer

Welcome Remarks

Rep. Judy Biggert (R-IL) and Rep. Russ Carnahan (D-MO)
Co-Chairs, High Performance Building Congressional Caucus

Response to Section 914 of EPACT 2005
Bill Coad
Chairman, High Performance Building Assessment Task Group

High Performance Building Council--Looking Forward
Get Moy
Chairman, High Performance Building Council


Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming Hearing
May 14, 2008, 2:00 PM

Building Green, Saving Green: Construction Sustainable and Energy-Efficient Buildings

(Back) Rep. Solis (D-Calif.); Chairman Markey; Rep. Inslee (D-Wash.); Rep. Blumenauer (D-Ore.); Rep. Cleaver (D-Mo.). (Seated) Mayor Gavin Newsom; ASHRAE President Kent Peterson; Actor Ed Norton; USGBC Sr. Vice President Michelle Moore.
(Back) Rep. Solis (D-Calif.); Chairman Markey; Rep. Inslee (D-Wash.); Rep. Blumenauer (D-Ore.); Rep. Cleaver (D-Mo.). (Seated) Mayor Gavin Newsom; ASHRAE President Kent Peterson; Actor Ed Norton; USGBC Sr. Vice President Michelle Moore.

 

ASHRAE President Kent Peterson and Actor Ed Norton
ASHRAE President Kent Peterson and Actor Ed Norton
USGBC's Michelle Moore, Actor Ed Norton, ASHRAE President Kent Peterson
USGBC's Michelle Moore, Actor Ed Norton, ASHRAE President Kent Peterson
Select Committee Chairman Ed Markey (D-Mass.)
Select Committee Chairman Ed Markey (D-Mass.)



Building Energy Codes as a Response to Climate Change

Sponsored by the Alliance to Save Energy

Building Energy Codes are a key tool in reducing the two-fifths of U.S. energy use and of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions that are due to buildings, and thus are a key part of our national energy policy. While codes are set by state and local governments, they rely on assistance from national organizations and DOE. In the past, codes have changed incrementally. But ASHRAE, which sets the model standard for commercial buildings, has adopted a goal of 30% energy savings in its next edition. DOE is supporting a 30% improvement in the codes for both homes and commercial buildings. And an important provision in the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act would set national targets for code improvements of 30% savings by 2010 and 50% savings by 2020. If fully implemented, such improvements could avoid 6 billion tons of carbon dioxide emissions through 2050.

Wednesday, April 30 2008
House of Representatives 11:00 am-12:30 pm (2456 Rayburn House Office Building)
Senate 1:30 pm-3:00 pm (366 Dirksen Senate Office Building)


Congressional Briefing, April 30, 2008 - Kateri Callahan Congressional Briefing, April 30, 2008 - Malcolm Woolf
Moderator: Kateri Callahan, President, Alliance to Save Energy Malcolm Woolf, Director, Maryland Energy Administration
Download file More Energy Efficient Buildings – One Approach to Saving Money and the Planet

Congressional Briefing, April 30, 2008 - David Rodgers Congressional Briefing, April 30, 2008 - James Wolf Congressional Briefing, April 30, 2008 - Lowell Ungar
David Rodgers, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
Download file Building Energy Codes as a Response to Climate Change
 James Wolf, Past President, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) and President, Global Policy Associates
Download file ASHRAE: Providing Technical Knowledge to Achieve Energy Goals
 Lowell Ungar, Director of Policy, Alliance to Save Energy
Download file Building Energy Codes Prevent Climate Change

 


The Role of Standards in Our Economy: Energy Efficiency and Safety in Our Buildings

Consensus-driven, standards have become key to making markets work efficiently, and are essential to both a sound national economy and to the facilitation of global commerce. The U.S. standards system is a demand-driven process in which standards are developed in response to specific concerns and needs expressed by industry, government, and consumers. The U.S. standardization infrastructure reflects a basic national belief that society will benefit and innovation and creativity will flourish in a system that is free from centralized government control but strengthened through essential governmental participation. It is an excellent example of how a strong, dynamic partnership between government and the private sector can help the nation achieve its economic and societal goals.

The event featured a discussion on the role of standards and model codes in the energy efficiency, safety, accessibility and security of our buildings.

December 4, 2007
U.S. House of Representatives
B-339 Rayburn House Office Building

Welcome
Jim Turner, General Counsel, Science and Technology Committee

Congressman Dennis Moore

Standards Development: A Consensus Process to Benefit Society
Joe Bhatia, President & CEO, American National Standards Institute

Achieving Energy Efficiency in the Built Environment through Standards
Kent Peterson, ASHRAE President

The Nexus between Standards and Government
Steve Shapiro, Board President, International Code Council

 

Kent Peterson with Congressman Dennis Moore
ASHRAE President Kent Peterson with Congressman Dennis Moore

Congressman Dennis Moore
Congressman Dennis Moore

ASHRAE President Kent Peterson
ASHRAE President Kent Peterson

ANSI President Joe Bhatia
ANSI President Joe Bhatia

ICC President Steve Shapiro
ICC President Steve Shapiro

Jim Turner, General Counsel, House Science & Technology Committee
Jim Turner, General Counsel, House Science & Technology Committee

 


September 20, 2007

To celebrate the signing into law of the America COMPETES Act of 2007 … and to thank Members of Congress, their staff, and supporters in the Executive Branch for their successful bipartisan efforts in passing this landmark authorizing legislation for science research, education, and innovation. The bill focuses on three primary areas of importance to maintaining and improving U.S. innovation in the 21st Century: (1) increasing research investment, (2) strengthening educational opportunities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics from elementary through graduate school, and (3) developing an innovation infrastructure. It is a legislative response to recommendations contained in the National Academies’ “Rising Above the Gathering Storm” report and the Council on Competitiveness’ “Innovate America” report.

Doug Read with Michigan Congressman Vernon Ehlers

Doug Read with Michigan Congressman Vernon Ehlers

Oregon Congressman David Wu, Chairman Technology and Innovation Subcommittee
 Congressman Vernon Ehlers, Ranking Member Research and Science Education Subcommittee
Congressman Vernon Ehlers, Ranking Member Research and Science Education Subcommittee
Congressmen Wu and Ehlers
Congressmen Wu and Ehlers
Oregon Congressman David
Wu, Chairman Technology
and Innovation Subcommittee

NIST: Supporting Industry and Promoting Technology

 Congressional Breifing NIST June 22 2007
NIST: Supporting Industry and Promoting Technology took place at the House Science & Technology Committee Hearing Room, Washington, DC on June 22, 2007.
• See more photos.  

The National Institute of Standards of Technology (NIST) promotes U.S economic growth by working with industry to develop and apply technologies across a broad spectrum of areas appropriate for the civilian industrial sector, and to develop and maintain world class capabilities in metrology and standards. NIST is currently working on projects to measure the amount of sunlight reaching the Earth, unbreakable encryptions for electronic communications, and the structural safety of buildings in hurricanes, fires, and earthquakes. NIST plays a variety of roles in support of voluntary standardization efforts that respond to market and industry needs. They provide technical expertise and facilitate private sector agreement. NIST has four major programs through which it helps U.S. industry: the NIST Laboratories (physics, electrical engineering, engineering, and building and fire research, etc.); the Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (HMEP), a nationwide network of centers to assist small manufacturers; the Advanced Technology Program (ATP), a grant program where NIST and industry partners cost share the early-stage development of innovative but high-risk technologies; and the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award program, the nation’s highest award for performance and business excellence.

June 22, 2007
House Science & Technology Committee Hearing Room, Washington, DC

Sponsored by ASHRAE, ASME, IEEE-USA, ACS, ASTRA, and ASTM

Welcome/Brief Overview: Chairman David Wu (D-OR), Ranking Member Phil Gingrey (R-GA) House Science and Technology Committee Subcommittee on Standards and Technology

Planning for the Future Success of U.S. Industry
William Jeffrey, Ph.D., Director. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

Laboratories: Providing State of the Art Facilities and Technology to the Research Community
Wade Troxell, Ph.D., Associate Dean for Research and Economic Development, College of Engineering, Colorado State University

Public/Private Partnership: High Risk Technologies
F.M. Ross Armbrecht, Jr. Ph.D., Executive Director, Delaware Foundation for Science and Math Education


Congressional Breifing JUne 7, 2007

Robert Atkinson, Michael Cassidy, and Rebecca Bagley respond to questions at the June 7th Briefing.
• See more photos.

The State’s Role in a Technology Economy

With publication of The World is Flat and Rising Above the Gathering Storm, there has been increased focus on the issue of competitiveness and the importance of innovation in a technology economy. Much of that attention, however, has centered on the role of the federal government. Whether it is funding higher education, supporting programs to assist entrepreneurs, or encouraging technology commercialization, the states play a critical role in today’s technology economy. In this briefing, we’ll explore the role the states are playing and can play in a technology economy. 

June 7, 2007
House Science & Technology Committee Hearing Room

Sponsored by ASHRAE, ASME, IEEE-USA, ASCE, SSTI in conjunction with the Congressional Research and Development (R&D) Caucus 
 

Welcome: Robert Atkinson, President, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, The Honorable Judy Biggert (R-IL), Co-Chair, House Research & Development Caucus
 

Representative Judy Biggert
Representative Judy Biggert speaks at the June 7th Briefing.
• See more photos. 
The Georgia Research Alliance: Investing in Higher Education for Today’s Economy
Michael Cassidy, President, Georgia Research Alliance
 
Pennsylvania TechFormation: Strategies for a Technology Economy
Rebecca Bagley, Deputy Secretary for Technology Investment, Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development



 

 

 


Briefing on Energy Efficient Buildings: Opportunities to Limit Greenhouse Gas Emissions

 Representative Judy Biggert
Representative Judy Biggert speaks at the March 26th Briefing.
• See more photos.
According to the U.S. Department of Energy, buildings consume about one-third of America’s energy. Therefore, the efficient use of energy in buildings is critical to maintaining the planet’s health and the sustainability of civilization. In the past few decades, the U.S. has made considerable progress in reducing the energy and carbon intensity—the ratio of carbon emissions to economic activity—of its building stock and operations. Despite increases in the average size of homes and the use of building equipment such as air conditioning and office equipment (e.g., computers), energy use in buildings since 1972 has increased at less than half the rate of the nation’s economic growth. Great potential exists to further reduce energy use. With a modest level of investment, energy efficient building designs and equipment can provide a short pay back period through reduced energy bills. Other positive outcomes attributable to the reduction in energy use include a more competitive economy, cleaner air, and lower greenhouse gas emissions.

March 26, 2007
House Science & Technology Committee Hearing Room

Welcome: Representative Judy Biggert

Download file Contributions of the Built Environment to Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Christine McEntee, executive vice president, American Institute of Architects

Download file Achieving Quantifiable Emissions Reductions in the Built Environment
Jeff Haberl, ASHRAE Fellow, Professor of Architecture, Texas A&M University

Download file Energy Efficiency and the Sustainable Building
Jared Blum, Policy Committee chair, Sustainable Buildings Industry Council, and president, Polyisocyanurate Insulation Manufacturers Association

This event was sponsored by ASHRAE


Briefing on Tax Incentives for Energy Efficient Commercial Buildings

Energy efficiency is critical for the economy, the environment and energy security. In the U.S., commercial buildings account for about 20 percent of total primary energy use. Heating, ventilation, air conditioning, refrigeration (HVAC&R) and water heating are responsible for about 64 percent of commercial building site energy use. Encouraging greater energy efficiency in buildings through tax incentives and other means can help reduce the nation’s dependence on foreign sources of energy, reduce the emission of greenhouse gases and other pollutants, and build the economy through the development of new technologies and decreases in energy related expenses. In this briefing, panelists will speak on the importance of energy efficient buildings, the role tax incentives serve in promoting increased efficiency, and the role of U.S. manufacturing in meeting efficiency goals.

December 7, 2006
House Science Committee Hearing Room

Welcome: Representative Bart Gordon

Download file Customer and Economic Considerations of the Commercial Building Tax Deduction
Steven Rosenstock, P.E.; Manager, Energy Solutions; Edison Electric Institute

Download file Technical Considerations for Energy Efficiency in Commercial Buildings
Harry Misuriello; Manager, Energy Efficiency Strategies; Owens Corning

Download file Commercial Building Efficiency Opportunities and Need for Tax Extender Legislation
Kyle Pitsor, Vice-President of Government Relations, National Electrical Manufacturers Association

This event was sponsored by ASHRAE

Copyright ©2008, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.

 

Eresources